From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:41:48 +0300 Subject: Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs In-Reply-To: References: <20100603192459.GA9169@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201006040337.10593.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201006040350.36944.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201006040353.35816.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20100604060338.GH6499@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20100607074147.GB15515@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Cory Maccarrone [100604 18:05]: > Tony Lindgren atomide.com> writes: > > All the new omap7xx boards I plan to submit in the future should be able to work > fine in a single defconfig. That's how I build now with my development tree. > I'd be perfectly happy to see my htcherald_defconfig get wrapped into a more > generic omap1_defconfig. OK. Do you want to take a look at fixing the omap1 entry-macro.S in a similar way to omap2 entry-macro.S so it works on 7xx too? See the ifdef MULTI_OMAP2 in entry-macro.S. 15xx is ARM925 based, so that's easy to detect. But for detecting between ARM926 based 7xx and 16xx you would have to use some other register. > They might even be generic enough that I won't need separate board files for > them -- I'll have to see when I get to that point. OK Regards, Tony