From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 00:04:15 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] target skeleton definition In-Reply-To: <87d3w2k0e0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <4c0d5b02.8c4bdf0a.5e33.ffff9c4e@mx.google.com> <20100607230541.5f2bf769@surf> <87d3w2k0e0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20100608000415.543cae7d@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:17:59 +0200 Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Thomas> Personaly, I'd prefer if we could get rid of the "busybox" > Thomas> skeleton altogether. I think Peter Korsgaard agreed with > Thomas> this decision, but I'll let him restate his preference here. > > Yes, I think now would be a good moment to cleanup this stuff. So, Dmytro, could you update your patch to remove the busybox skeleton, and just put the default skeleton in fs/skeleton ? You could indeed split it in two patches: * One doing the skeleton move * One adding the option to configure the skeleton Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com