diff for duplicates of <20100608054446.GT26335@laptop>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e7e82de..bc367f4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -9,8 +9,3 @@ On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
 
 Oh, I don't have a problem with your EOF fix being merged now, as Jan's
 patch isn't suitable for 2.6.35.
-
-_______________________________________________
-xfs mailing list
-xfs@oss.sgi.com
-http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4f8517b..8dec5cc 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:44:46 +1000\0"
  "To\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org"
-  akpm@linux-foundation.org
-  torvalds@linux-foundation.org
+ "Cc\0torvalds@linux-foundation.org"
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
- " xfs@oss.sgi.com\0"
+  xfs@oss.sgi.com
+ " akpm@linux-foundation.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:\n"
@@ -20,11 +20,6 @@
  "> is probably just as important as the bug fixes.\n"
  "\n"
  "Oh, I don't have a problem with your EOF fix being merged now, as Jan's\n"
- "patch isn't suitable for 2.6.35.\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "xfs mailing list\n"
- "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
- http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
+ patch isn't suitable for 2.6.35.
 
-b9e900c247126b45b835e667f05a2c5d2c1430047cd65b4d5060aaee4d95a219
+4c7af68ef51a02c0513cbe341ff86eaaf2dede2629bcaf001017112764def4a2
