From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:31:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608123102.GT15515@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100608115832.GB25370@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [100608 14:53]:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:51:24PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Linus wants something to be done about the current defconfig mess which
> > is perfectly legitimate. He even suggested a possible solution. I
> > don't think he'll simply drop those defconfig files if we demonstrate
> > that we're taking action to fix the actual problem.
>
> However, having a set of patches which combine a load of defconfig
> files into one is not going to solve the problem.
>
> If you're hypothesis that Linus is only looking at the diffstat, then
> what are patches to combine the defconfigs going to do? It's going
> to create lots of noise in arch/arm/configs/ - which is precisely what
> Linus is complaining about. In fact, patch-wise it's going to create
> an extremely large patch. And if we do this time and time again while
> progressively reducing the defconfigs. No, this isn't the answer -
> it's only going to make the problem worse.
>
> I believe the only acceptable solution is to get an alterative method
> in place - no matter what it is - and remove the all but one of the
> defconfig files from the mainline kernel. _And_, most importantly,
> kautobuild needs to be fixed so that we still get build coverage.
>
> The loss of kautobuild is a major concern here, and I believe it trumps
> everything else for the next merge window. Kautobuild is an extremely
> important resource that we simply can not afford to lose.
How about the following strategy for the next merge window:
- Update kautobuild to temporarily host the current defconfigs
- Remove all the arm defconfigs except one
Then over the next few merge cycles:
- Make the ARM platform specific Kconfig or similar option to work
- Drop the old defconfigs from kautobuild once we have the new solution
Then over yet unknown lenght of time:
- Work towards building in more features (TLS/SMP/VFPvX) into the same kernel
- Work towards building in multiple ARM platforms into the same kernel
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 19:24 Heads up: Linus plans to kill ARM defconfigs Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 19:55 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-03 20:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 20:27 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-03 20:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 14:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 23:46 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-04 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-03 19:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 20:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-03 20:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 21:04 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 22:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-03 23:33 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 23:45 ` Kyungmin Park
2010-06-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-04 1:10 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:16 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-04 1:35 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 1:37 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:50 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 1:53 ` Marek Vasut
2010-06-04 6:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 14:59 ` Cory Maccarrone
2010-06-07 7:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 1:57 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 6:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 7:12 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 8:40 ` Martin Guy
2010-06-04 20:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-04 22:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-06-08 11:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 12:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-06-08 12:43 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 13:00 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:43 ` David John
2010-06-08 12:44 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 12:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 13:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 13:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 14:51 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-08 16:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:23 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-08 12:50 ` Christer Weinigel
2010-06-08 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 20:51 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 21:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-08 21:32 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 23:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:21 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-08 23:26 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-08 23:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-08 23:52 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-09 0:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-09 6:07 ` Hendrik Sattler
2010-06-09 13:32 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-10 6:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-10 19:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-06-09 21:56 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-25 12:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-06-07 21:09 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-04 10:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 8:36 ` pieterg
[not found] ` <AANLkTilyIb8WDAanNHlQKHco6rSjzNjNS9Q3TpWQqt8o@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-04 8:42 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-04 8:56 ` Daniel Mack
2010-06-04 9:37 ` pieterg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100608123102.GT15515@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.