From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default?
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:15:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20100608161545.GB4900@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <20100608111501.GP17817@reaktio.net> <4C0E667F.2040306@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C0E667F.2040306@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:49:19AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 04:15 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
> > Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-=
unstable?=20
> > And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell?=20
> >  =20
>=20
> Yes, I was just thinking that.

On top of that, what about that udev(new version) race condition? I
think James and Bastian both provided a patch - does it make sense to
merge it in both branches (.31 and .32)?