From: Dave McCracken <dcm@mccr.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Xen Developers List <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux PATCH] Fix to hugepages to work around new PWT handling
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:26:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006091426.03926.dcm@mccr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0FE359.1000305@goop.org>
On Wednesday, June 09, 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>> An additional fix here is to make sure the _PAGE_PRESENT bit is set
> >>> before hugepages does a mk_pte(), since Xen depends on that bit to
> >>> trigger the pfn->mfn translation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Why is the kernel creating a non-present mapping? If it isn't present,
> >> why does it matter whether we do the pfn->mfn conversion?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > The hugepage function make_huge_pte() called mk_pte() to turn a page and
> > a pgprot into a pte before it set PRESENT. The PRESENT flag was set
> > after the pte was made. This meant that the Xen version of the macro
> > did not see PRESENT so did not do the pfn_to_mfn(). My patch sets
> > PRESENT first so the right thing will happen.
> >
> >
>
> But in general kernel code shouldn't be just nakedly setting present on
> the pte without also remaking the whole thing. That doesn't happen with
> normal ptes, and it probably shouldn't happen with huge ptes. Forcing
> present on a pte at this level seems very bogus. Why not change the
> upper code to set present if that's want it wants?
>
> I'll skip this chunk for now.
Um, this is the upper level code. The entire purpose of make_huge_pte is to
construct a present huge pte from page and pgprot. The problem is that the
original code makes the pte, then sets the present bit via pte_mkhuge(). This
means the Xen-specific macro that triggers on present is misled and doesn't do
the pfn_to_mfn(). Without this patch hugepages is handing pfns to the
hypervisor to map instead of mfns.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 14:02 [Linux PATCH] Fix to hugepages to work around new PWT handling Dave McCracken
2010-06-09 18:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-09 18:35 ` Dave McCracken
2010-06-09 18:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-09 19:26 ` Dave McCracken [this message]
2010-06-24 10:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-06-24 22:38 ` Dave McCracken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006091426.03926.dcm@mccr.org \
--to=dcm@mccr.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.