From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7125217750113095729==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Denis Kenzior Subject: Re: SMS status report Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:47:28 -0500 Message-ID: <201006100947.29139.denkenz@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1276153545-22260-1-git-send-email-pasi.miettinen@ixonos.com> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============7125217750113095729== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pasi, > So if one mr is concidered undeliverable, the whole id is removed > from the data structure and the mr numbers that still may arrive > as "delivered" are not taken into account anymore. That sounds fine. > = > Do we already have a plan for how accurately we are going to check > these status report status codes? My thinking right now is that we should take all success and all permanent = error codes into account. But that is quite easy... Was there something else to your question? Regards, -Denis --===============7125217750113095729==--