From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] VFS: introduce s_dirty accessors
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100611014253.GE31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276167393-31492-2-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:56:33PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
>
> This patch introduces 3 VFS accessors: 'sb_mark_dirty()',
> 'sb_mark_clean()', and 'sb_is_dirty()'. They simply
> set 'sb->s_dirt' or test 'sb->s_dirt'. The plan is to make
> every FS use these accessors later instead of manipulating
> the 'sb->s_dirt' flag directly.
>
> Ultimately, this change is a preparation for the periodic
> superblock synchronization optimization which is about
> preventing the "sync_supers" kernel thread from waking up
> even if there is nothing to synchronize.
>
> This patch does not do any functional change, just adds
> accessor functions.
Applied and pushed. It's in for-next, which should do until Linus
comes back and picks it...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 10:56 [PATCH 0/1] VFS: introduce s_dirty accessors Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-10 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-11 1:42 ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-07-05 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-05 13:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-07-09 22:27 ` tytso
2010-07-09 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-10 4:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100611014253.GE31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.