From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:02:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100611200218.GE3018@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilRCWlM5ZklGOb26Xj9XAmBdY1S702WyQGuaK_l@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > The others all fix oopsen or big problems, and I think fixing warnings
> > helps avoid false negatives as others look for real problems?
> >
> > I'm happy to rebase out the 3 non-criticals.
>
> There seems to be more than three non-criticals. There's the warning
> fixes, the "unused variables" thing, the "memdup_user()" thing, a
> couple of unnecessary NULL checks removed etc. On the whole, I do not
> get the feeling that the pull request was actively trying to be
> minimal, and that's what I really want to see.
No problem, I like to err on the side of pulling in safe fixes from the
automated checkers so they don't have to go through results again.
But, I've got a completely minimal rebase now and I'm double checking
it.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-11 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 19:37 [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35 Chris Mason
2010-06-11 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-11 19:48 ` Chris Mason
2010-06-11 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-11 20:02 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2010-06-11 20:28 ` Chris Mason
2010-06-14 19:24 ` Ed Tomlinson
2010-06-15 0:47 ` Chris Mason
2010-06-15 11:17 ` Ed Tomlinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100611200218.GE3018@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.