All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, josef@redhat.com, jeffmerkey@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fsfreeze: Prevent emergency thaw from looping infinitely
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:18:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614151815.GA32354@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276154395-24766-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:19:50PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Return -EINVAL when the filesystem is already unfrozen to avoid this
> problem.


This includes some additional changes in addition to the description,
and at least one of them seems incorrect.

> -	error = 0;
> -	if (--bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count > 0)
> +	if (!sb)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	if (!sb)
> +	error = 0;
> +	if (--bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count > 0)
>  		goto out;

Here you reorder the sb check to be before the counter decrement.  But
we do support calling freeze_bdev on a device without a superblock, and
you would leak bd_fsfreeze_count for that case and wrongly return
-EINVAL on unthaw for these now.

>  	error = thaw_super(sb);
> -	if (error) {
> +	if (error)
>  		bdev->bd_fsfreeze_count++;
> -		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
> -		return error;
> -	}

Ok, useful cleanup.

>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
> -	return 0;
> +	return error;

And this is the actual fix of course, also looks good.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-10  7:19 [RFC, PATCH 0/5] fsfreeze: fix sb vs bdev freeze/thaw b0rkage Dave Chinner
2010-06-10  7:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] fsfreeze: Prevent emergency thaw from looping infinitely Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:18   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-06-14 23:19     ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-10  7:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] fsfreeze: emergency thaw will deadlock on s_umount Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-14 23:21     ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-21  1:57     ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-21  7:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10  7:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] fsfreeze: freeze_super and thaw_bdev don't play well together Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15  0:01     ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-15  6:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10  7:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] fsfreeze: switch to using super methods everywhere Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10  7:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] fsfreeze: move emergency thaw code to fs/super.c Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10 12:45 ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] fsfreeze: fix sb vs bdev freeze/thaw b0rkage Josef Bacik
2010-06-10 12:45   ` Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100614151815.GA32354@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jeffmerkey@gmail.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.