All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
	shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 5/5] PPC64-HWBKPT: Discard extraneous interrupt due to accesses outside symbol length
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:37:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615060733.GA2971@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100610124024.GA28613@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:40:24PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:55:59PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> 
> > +	if (!((bp->attr.bp_addr <= dar) &&
> > +	     (dar <= (bp->attr.bp_addr + bp->attr.bp_len)))) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * This exception is triggered not because of a memory access
> > +		 * on the monitored variable but in the double-word address
> > +		 * range in which it is contained. We will consume this
> > +		 * exception, considering it as 'noise'.
> > +		 */
> > +		info->extraneous_interrupt = true;
> > +	}
> 
> Ummm, don't you need to add "else info->extraneous_interrupt = false;"
> here?  I don't see anywhere that you ever clear it otherwise.
> 
> Also, I think you need to do the "if (!info->extraneous_interrupt)"
> check around the call to perf_bp_event() later on in
> hw_breakpoint_handler() as well as around the call in
> single_step_dabr_instruction().
> 
> Paul.

True, I've added the check before perf_bp_event() (wherever it was
missing before) in the patchset ver XXIV.

Thanks,
K.Prasad

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100609101417.644628763@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-06-09 10:25 ` [Patch 1/5] Allow arch-specific cleanup before breakpoint unregistration K.Prasad
2010-06-09 10:25 ` [Patch 2/5] PPC64-HWBKPT: Implement hw-breakpoints for PowerPC BookIII S K.Prasad
2010-06-09 10:25 ` [Patch 3/5] PPC64-HWBKPT: Handle concurrent alignment interrupts K.Prasad
2010-06-09 10:25 ` [Patch 4/5] PPC64-HWBKPT: Enable hw-breakpoints while handling intervening signals K.Prasad
2010-06-09 10:25 ` [Patch 5/5] PPC64-HWBKPT: Discard extraneous interrupt due to accesses outside symbol length K.Prasad
2010-06-10 12:40   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-06-15  6:07     ` K.Prasad [this message]
     [not found] <20100615055010.108795721@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-06-15  6:06 ` K.Prasad
     [not found] <20100528061928.677651410@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-05-28  6:41 ` K.Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100615060733.GA2971@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.