All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Salman <sqazi@google.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, tytso@google.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, walken@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately.)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:35:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615183525.GA24577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100611224902.5039.60134.stgit@bumblebee1.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 06/11, Salman wrote:
>
> A program that repeatedly forks and waits is susceptible to having the
> same pid repeated,

I agree this patch should fix this.

But the kernel still can use the same pid twice in a row, I am wondering
if there a simple solution to prevent this. Probably not, and this case
is unlikely.

While we are here, and given that many reviewers recently inspected
alloc_pidmap(), probably someone can explain the mysterious checks
in do/while loop ?

See the patch I am going to send, it is on top on Salman's fix but doesn't
really depend on it.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-11 17:17 [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately Salman
2010-06-11 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-11 22:49   ` Salman
2010-06-11 23:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-14 23:58     ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15  0:56       ` tytso
2010-06-15  1:55         ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15  3:26           ` Paul Mackerras
2010-06-15  4:21             ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15  4:38               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15  6:57               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-15  7:25               ` Paul Mackerras
2010-06-15 12:56           ` tytso
2010-06-15 13:06             ` Kyle McMartin
2010-06-15 14:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-15 19:37             ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15 18:35     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-06-15 18:35       ` [PATCH 1/1] pids: alloc_pidmap: remove the unnecessary boundary checks Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100615183525.GA24577@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sqazi@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@google.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.