From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:51990 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757914Ab0FPPaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:30:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:29:03 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Kouhei Sutou Cc: mcgrof@gmail.com, Stephen.Chen@atheros.com, David.Quan@atheros.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael.Green@atheros.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] zd1211rw: ignore unknown regulatory domain. Message-ID: <20100616152903.GA3138@tuxdriver.com> References: <20100616.215523.1718341995174283889.kou@clear-code.com> <20100616134421.GB2404@tuxdriver.com> <20100617.000223.656204364469558896.kou@clear-code.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20100617.000223.656204364469558896.kou@clear-code.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:02:23AM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote: > Hi, > > In <20100616134421.GB2404@tuxdriver.com> > "Re: [PATCH] zd1211rw: ignore unknown regulatory domain." on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:44:22 -0400, > "John W. Linville" wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:55:23PM +0900, Kouhei Sutou wrote: > > > >> I used 'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_GW_US54GXS' as a macro name for > >> 0x49 because 0x49 is used by GW-US54GXS. Is it OK? Or should > >> I use other name for it? > > > > Hopefully someone can suggest a better name. Anyone know what inspired > > "ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_ADD"? > > 'ZD_REGDOMAIN_JAPAN_3' was used in another patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/47220/ > > But I don't know why '3' was used... '3' makes sense to me. The better question is why not change 'ADD' to '2'? :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.