All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	mingo@elte.hu, bphilips@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
	gregkh@suse.de, khali@linux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:02:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100617090229.543af62c@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1A4548.3020602@kernel.org>

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:54:48 +0200
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Crazy devices too but I think they would
> fall in a single tick any way. 

not sure what ticks have to do with anything but ok ;)

> At any rate, let's say I have those
> numbers, how would I feed it into c-state selection?

if we have this, we need to put a bit of glue in the backend that
tracks (per cpu I suppose) the shortest expected interrupt, which
the C state code then queries.
(and in that regard, it does not matter if shortest expected is
computed via heuristic on a per irq basis, or passed in).

mapping an irq to a cpu is not a 100% science (since interrupts can
move in theory), but just assuming that the irq will happen on the same
CPU it happened last time is more than good enough.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-13 15:31 [PATCHSET] irq: better lost/spurious irq handling Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 01/12] irq: cleanup irqfixup Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] irq: make spurious poll timer per desc Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15  5:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-15 16:34     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 03/12] irq: use desc->poll_timer for irqpoll Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 04/12] irq: kill IRQF_IRQPOLL Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 05/12] irq: misc preparations for further changes Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 06/12] irq: implement irq_schedule_poll() Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 17:40   ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-06-15 17:51     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 13:26     ` [PATCH 06/12 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 07/12] irq: improve spurious IRQ handling Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 08/12] irq: implement IRQ watching Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14  9:21   ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-14  9:43     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14  9:46       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17  3:48   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-17  8:18     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 11:12       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-17 11:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 11:43           ` Alan Cox
2010-06-17 15:54             ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 16:02               ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2010-06-17 16:47                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-18  6:26                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-18  9:23                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-18  9:45                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-19  8:35     ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19  8:42       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-19  9:00         ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19  9:03           ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-19 14:54           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-19 19:49             ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19 20:07               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 10/12] irq: add comment about overall design of lost/spurious IRQ handling Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 13:52   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-25  0:22   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25  7:44     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-25  9:48       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25  9:51         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-25 13:02           ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update Tejun Heo
2010-06-25 13:03             ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: always use ata_qc_complete_multiple() for NCQ command completions Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 22:03               ` Jeff Garzik
2010-08-01 23:47             ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update Jeff Garzik
2010-08-02  7:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-04  4:22                 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  3:45       ` [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  3:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  8:31         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-26  9:16           ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  9:44             ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-02 14:41               ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-02 14:53                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-10 10:06                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14  7:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-07-14  9:26                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-27 17:37                 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 12/12] usb: use IRQ watching Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14 21:41   ` Greg KH
2010-06-14 21:52     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14 22:11       ` Greg KH
2010-06-14 22:19       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 10:30         ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 11:05           ` Jean Delvare
2010-06-15 13:30             ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 11:20           ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 13:36             ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 17:36               ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 17:47                 ` Greg KH
2010-06-15 17:52                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 13:51   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 20:27     ` Greg KH
2010-06-22  7:32       ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-02 14:59 ` [GIT PULL] irq: better lost/spurious irq handling Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100617090229.543af62c@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bphilips@suse.de \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.