From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: unify flags for struct bio and struct request
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:14:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20100618091443.GA17410@lst.de>
References: <20100618074704.GB13358@lst.de> <20100618090753.GF6138@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:36429 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758129Ab0FRJOp (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:14:45 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100618090753.GF6138@laptop>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 07:07:53PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Any reason not to make REQ_RAHEAD include REQ_FAILFAST_MASK?

Yeah, could do that.  Initially I planned to just remove REQ_RAHEAD,
but the MD code will cancel read-ahead requests even without a real
error.