* [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261, bmr45X,
@ 2010-06-18 16:44 Guenter Roeck
2010-06-18 16:57 ` [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261, Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2010-06-18 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi all,
I have prototype hardware monitoring drivers for the following devices.
I2C/SMBus:
LTC4261
PMBus:
BMR45X (BMR450, BMR451, BMR452, BMR453, BMR454)
LTC2978
MAX16064
MAX8688
UCD92xx (UCD921x, UCD9220, UCD9240)
and other PMBus chips with HW monitoring features
Due to lack of HW (still waiting for it), I have not yet been able to test the drivers
with real HW. Drivers were tested by simulating the devices, with a simulation driver
similar to i2c-stub.
If you have access to a board with any of the above chips, and if you have time
to test the drivers, please let me know, and I'll to send you a patch.
Jean - I am not sure if it makes sense to submit the drivers to the list for
comments/reviews at this time, due to lack of testing with real HW. What do you think ?
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261,
2010-06-18 16:44 [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261, bmr45X, Guenter Roeck
@ 2010-06-18 16:57 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-06-18 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:44:47 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have prototype hardware monitoring drivers for the following devices.
>
> I2C/SMBus:
> LTC4261
>
> PMBus:
> BMR45X (BMR450, BMR451, BMR452, BMR453, BMR454)
> LTC2978
> MAX16064
> MAX8688
> UCD92xx (UCD921x, UCD9220, UCD9240)
> and other PMBus chips with HW monitoring features
>
> Due to lack of HW (still waiting for it), I have not yet been able to test the drivers
> with real HW. Drivers were tested by simulating the devices, with a simulation driver
> similar to i2c-stub.
>
> If you have access to a board with any of the above chips, and if you have time
> to test the drivers, please let me know, and I'll to send you a patch.
>
> Jean - I am not sure if it makes sense to submit the drivers to the list for
> comments/reviews at this time, due to lack of testing with real HW. What do you think ?
This shouldn't stop you, especially if you were able to run them
already using a simulation driver. Just post the patches, it can't
hurt. Not that I expect a lot of reviews, with the limited bandwidth
everybody has, but you never know.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-18 16:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-18 16:44 [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261, bmr45X, Guenter Roeck
2010-06-18 16:57 ` [lm-sensors] Looking for test coverage: drivers for ltc4261, Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.