Re: wireless-regdb: FI/CZ updates

["John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>]

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:42:58PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:30:37AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Pekka, please remove these changes from this patch, you want to make
> > your patches atomic, with only one purpose to help the review process
> > easier. You stashed changes to CZ & FI on one... You also switched
> > from dBm to mW and note how you actually did change the EIRP here for
> > only one for FI. Please provide a separate set of patches for that for
> > FI. If you want to switch to mW for all of the entries for FI first do
> > that, and then on a separate patch make the actual regulatory changes
> > so this is crystal clear for the review process.
> Okie
> 
> Looking at it a bit more probably makes sense to codify the current
> harmonized EU rules, and then just for each country note that they've
> actually implemented it in their local legislation (I checked FI, SE and
> CZ).  Everyone should have, but some are pretty slow at this, or
> have some special national interests...
> 
> The legislation uses mW, so that's the reason I switched them.
> 
> For review (first hit on google for the decision number
> should find the official text), I can do patches once someone
> has verified, that this is what the legalese actually says:
> 
> # EU Commission Decision 2009/381/EC
>        (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100mW)
> # 2005/513/EC and 2007/90/EC, 5250 and 5470 can be doubled if TPC is in use
>        (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 200mW), NO-OUTDOOR
>        (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>        (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500mW), DFS

Ping?

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.