[patch 1/3] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible

[Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: 701-zfcp-fallout.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --]

From: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>

A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els 
is possible or not.

Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
---

 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c	2010-06-21 09:37:39.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c	2010-06-21 09:37:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(s
 	}
 
 	/* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */
-	if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
+	if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
 		zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req,
 						sg_req, sg_resp);
 		return 0;