From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from goalie.tycho.ncsc.mil (goalie [144.51.3.250]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o5LIWutw005949 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:32:56 -0400 Received: from g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msux-gh1-uea01.nsa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o5LIW5LY011792 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:32:05 GMT Received: from g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com [16.228.8.141]) by g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520B4C275 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ldl (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30]) by g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212702020B for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ldl.fc.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) by ldl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9603CF000B for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:32:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ldl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ldl.fc.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfZUhhhKjhyV for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:32:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from flek.localnet (squirrel.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.57]) by ldl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EA6CF0008 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:32:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Paul Moore To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SELinux UNIX domain socket fixes/cleanup Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:32:53 -0400 References: <20100529214628.4042.88276.stgit@flek.lan> In-Reply-To: <20100529214628.4042.88276.stgit@flek.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201006211432.53781.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Saturday, May 29, 2010 05:53:16 pm Paul Moore wrote: > I finally got a chance to cobble together some tests to verify both > getpeercon() on the client end of a connected UNIX domain socket as well > as the proper operation of fsetxattr() on sockets. I'm happy to report > that everything worked as I expected it to (UNIX sockets now behave like > INET sockets) and nothing exploded. This latest version of the patchset > should include all the feedback I've received so far as well as my > sign-off on each patch so I think we should be in good shape at this > point. As a result, I'm submitting these patches for whatever kernel > release looks most appropriate - maybe to late for .35, but you might > be able to make a weak argument that some of the patches are > bugfixes - regardless, I'll let you guys make that call; as long as > they go somewhere I'll be happy. > > For those of you using git, you can also find a copy of the patches at > the URL below. > > * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing Just a quick follow-up for the archives ... James has merged patches 2 through 6 with patch 1 being intentionally excluded due to concerns from Stephan Smalley over the potential race conditions described in the comments. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.