From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers-native, gcc-cross issue
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:58:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100621195806.GA28518@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5tkEC0OmJRmnItPYD53U0g87kjoWVCJOKL64y@mail.gmail.com>
On (21/06/10 21:49), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2010/6/21 Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>:
> > On (21/06/10 21:27), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> >> 2010/6/21 Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>:
> >> > Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Dear all,
> >> >>
> >> >> After the introduction of linux-libc-headers-native I've bumped into
> >> >> the following issue.
> >> >> linux-libc-headers-native installs unistd.h in sysroots
> >> >> This causes other recipes to pick up the x86 files instead of the target
> >> >> ones.
> >> >> I've seen this happen for both unistd.h and sigcontext.h
> >> >
> >> > What DISTRO/MACHINE are you using?
> >>
> >> DISTRO is angstrom-2008.1, MACHINE is NEEK; this one is NIOS2 based
> >> and not committed yet.
> >> From examining the gcc-cross dir I suspect some other archtectures
> >> will also be vulnerable to this (as they also have a linux-unwind.h
> >> which includes signal.h to get sigcontext).
> >> The following architectures have a sigcontext struct in their gcc/config dir:
> >>
> >> gcc-cross-4.1.2-r23.1/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/config> grep -r sigcontext .
> >> ./sh/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./sh/linux-unwind.h: sc = (struct sigcontext *) (void *)
> >> &rt_->uc.uc_mcontext;
> >> ./sh/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./sh/linux-unwind.h: sc = (struct sigcontext *) (void *)
> >> &rt_->uc.uc_mcontext;
> >> ./alpha/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./i386/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./i386/linux-unwind.h: sc = (struct sigcontext *) (void *)
> >> &uc_->uc_mcontext;
> >> ./i386/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./i386/linux-unwind.h: sc = (struct sigcontext *) (void *)
> >> &rt_->uc.uc_mcontext;
> >> ./mips/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext uc_mcontext;
> >> ./mips/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./mips/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext sigctx;
> >> ./mips/linux-unwind.h: /* On o32 Linux, the register save slots in
> >> the sigcontext are
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h:/* This works only for glibc-2.3 and later,
> >> because sigcontext is different
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc = frame_->sc;
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: in the sigcontext but leaves them intact, so there's no
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc = frame->sc;
> >> ./ia64/linux-unwind.h: in the sigcontext but leaves them intact, so there's no
> >> ./pa/linux-unwind.h: tell us how to locate the sigcontext structure.
> >> ./pa/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext *sc;
> >> ./nios2/linux-unwind.h: struct sigcontext ctx;
> >
> > try to port recipes/gcc/gcc-4.2.4/sh_unwind.patch to nios. This could help
> > here.
> >
>
> Will look into it. This might indeed help (actually I don't know too
> much about this).
> Still of course this is only a workaround.
no its not a workaround. such a fix is upstream in gcc for SH and MIPS
The root cause is the host
> inc dir when compiling a target dir.
> Thinking of it, apart from fixing the root cause (which is probably
> above my capabilities),
GMPINC should not be passed when building target files. I will see if I can
cook up something.
the simplest way would be just to patch the
> generated Makefile and remove the offending -I
> That would also solve my unistd.h problem.
thats even uglier to much with generated files.
>
> Frans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-21 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-20 20:51 linux-libc-headers-native, gcc-cross issue Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-06-20 22:45 ` Khem Raj
2010-06-21 13:01 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-06-21 17:40 ` Khem Raj
2010-06-21 19:32 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-06-21 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2010-06-21 19:27 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-06-21 19:36 ` Khem Raj
2010-06-21 19:49 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-06-21 19:58 ` Khem Raj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100621195806.GA28518@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.