From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Moyer Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfq: always return false from should_idle if slice_idle is set to zero
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:05:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100621230518.GA10105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277149789-4493-2-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In testing a competing fsync-ing process and a sequential reader on
> mid-grade storage, I found that cfq was incapable of achieving the I/O
> rates of deadline, no matter how it was tuned. Investigation, and insight
> from Vivek (mostly the latter), led to identifying that we were still
> idling for the last queue in the service tree.
>
> Modifying cfq_should_idle to not idle when slice_idle is set to zero got
> us much closer to the performance of deadline for this workload. I have
> one follow-on patch that gets us on-par with deadline, but I think this
> patch stands alone.
>
> Comments, as always, are appreciated.
>
Looks good to me Jeff. This does take away one functionality and that is
ability to get group service differentation even with slice_idle=0.
cfq_should_idle() was making sure that we don't select the next queue
from next group.
But I think a better way to fix that would be to introduce a new tunable
say group_idle. That way if we are running on some powerful storage box
and don't want the overhead of idling, we can do slice_idle=0 and not idle
among the cfqq's with-in group but still do idle a bit on group and get
the group service differentiation.
I have a small patch for implementing group_idle. I will post that once
you patch is in Jens's tree.
Thanks
Vivek
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 5ff4f48..572a050 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -1842,6 +1842,10 @@ static bool cfq_should_idle(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> if (prio == IDLE_WORKLOAD)
> return false;
>
> + /* Don't idle if slice idling is disabled by the user */
> + if (cfqd->cfq_slice_idle == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> /* We do for queues that were marked with idle window flag. */
> if (cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) &&
> !(blk_queue_nonrot(cfqd->queue) && cfqd->hw_tag))
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-21 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 19:49 [PATCH 0/2] cfq: fixes to bring cfq in line with deadline performance for mid- to high-end storage Jeff Moyer
2010-06-21 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] cfq: always return false from should_idle if slice_idle is set to zero Jeff Moyer
2010-06-21 20:00 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 18:41 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-28 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 18:54 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-21 23:05 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2010-06-21 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] cfq: allow dispatching of both sync and async I/O together Jeff Moyer
2010-06-21 19:59 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-21 20:05 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-21 23:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-06-22 4:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-06-22 12:45 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-22 13:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-06-22 13:21 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-22 14:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-06-22 14:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-28 18:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-06-28 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100621230518.GA10105@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.