Re: [PATCH] proc: Add complete process group list

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:07:26 +0900
Mike McCormack <mikem@ring3k.org> wrote:

> If a process is in more than NGROUPS_SMALL (32) groups, it's not possible
>  for any other user space process to determine the list of groups it is
>  in using /proc/<pid>/status.
> 
> Increasing the list of groups listed by /proc/<pid>/status would lead to
>  very long lines that file, and possible misbehavior of userspace programs
>  that parse /proc/<pid>/status, so instead I have opted to create a new
>  file /proc/<pid>/groups, which contains the list of supplementary groups
>  for each pid.
> 
> The new file /proc/<pid>/groups consists of a single group id per line,
>  with each line being 11 characters long.  This should be enough space
>  for 16bit or 32bit group ids.
> 
> This feature might be useful for a server listening on a unix domain pipe
>  to determine the list of groups that a client process is in from its pid.

"might be"?

It would be useful to hear a bit more about usage scenarios, why this
is needed, etc - some hard info which would justify permanent extension
of the kernel->userspace API.  How does this get used, why is it
needed, what are the alternatives, etc.

I don't recall having heard of anyone using the groups fields in
/proc/pid/status before.