From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:34957 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752654Ab0FWSqW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:46:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:46:20 -0400 To: Yudong Gao Cc: Benny Halevy , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Supported cluster file system in v4.1 Message-ID: <20100623184620.GD28346@fieldses.org> References: <4C21AE7F.9080103@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:14:09AM -0700, Yudong Gao wrote: > Hi Benny, > > Thanks a lot for the reply! I will check exofs. > > We are looking for a block-based cluster file system that can be > deployed on top of a cluster of commodity machines and can use the > machines' local storage instead of using a SAN. We find that OCFS2 is > a good candidate. As far as I can tell OCFS2 and GFS2 are identical in their requirement for a shared disk. --b. > Is it possible to use OCFS2 as the storage server in > pNFS?