From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
Arne Nordmark <nordmark@mech.kth.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] 3c59x: Use fine-grained locks for MII and windowed register access
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:05:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100624120517.GI5570@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277337341.26161.18.camel@localhost>
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:55:41AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This avoids scheduling in atomic context and also means that IRQs
> will only be deferred for relatively short periods of time.
>
> Previously discussed in:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/155024
>
> Reported-by: Arne Nordmark <nordmark@mech.kth.se>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Tested-by: Arne Nordmark <nordmark@mech.kth.se> [against 2.6.32]
> ---
> drivers/net/3c59x.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> index beddef9..f4a3fb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> @@ -644,9 +644,15 @@ struct vortex_private {
> u16 deferred; /* Resend these interrupts when we
> * bale from the ISR */
> u16 io_size; /* Size of PCI region (for release_region) */
> - spinlock_t lock; /* Serialise access to device & its vortex_private */
> - struct mii_if_info mii; /* MII lib hooks/info */
> - int window; /* Register window */
> +
> + /* Serialises access to hardware other than MII and variables below.
> + * The lock hierarchy is rtnl_lock > lock > mii_lock > window_lock. */
> + spinlock_t lock;
> +
> + spinlock_t mii_lock; /* Serialises access to MII */
> + struct mii_if_info mii; /* MII lib hooks/info */
> + spinlock_t window_lock; /* Serialises access to windowed regs */
You should initialize the new locks properly with spin_lock_init().
> + int window; /* Register window */
> };
>
> static void window_set(struct vortex_private *vp, int window)
> @@ -661,15 +667,23 @@ static void window_set(struct vortex_private *vp, int window)
> static u ## size \
> window_read ## size(struct vortex_private *vp, int window, int addr) \
> { \
> + unsigned long flags; \
> + u ## size ret; \
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vp->window_lock, flags); \
> window_set(vp, window); \
> - return ioread ## size(vp->ioaddr + addr); \
> + ret = ioread ## size(vp->ioaddr + addr); \
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp->window_lock, flags); \
> + return ret; \
> } \
> static void \
> window_write ## size(struct vortex_private *vp, u ## size value, \
> int window, int addr) \
> { \
> + unsigned long flags; \
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vp->window_lock, flags); \
> window_set(vp, window); \
> iowrite ## size(value, vp->ioaddr + addr); \
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp->window_lock, flags); \
> }
This adds a lot of calls to spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore to many
places where this is not necessary at all. For example during device probe and
device open, window_read/window_write are called multiple times, each time
disabling the interrupts. I'd suggest to have unlocked, locked and irqsave
versions of window_read/window_write and use them in appropriate places.
> DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(8)
> DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(16)
> @@ -1784,7 +1798,6 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data)
> pr_debug("dev->watchdog_timeo=%d\n", dev->watchdog_timeo);
> }
>
> - disable_irq_lockdep(dev->irq);
> media_status = window_read16(vp, 4, Wn4_Media);
> switch (dev->if_port) {
> case XCVR_10baseT: case XCVR_100baseTx: case XCVR_100baseFx:
> @@ -1805,10 +1818,7 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data)
> case XCVR_MII: case XCVR_NWAY:
> {
> ok = 1;
> - /* Interrupts are already disabled */
> - spin_lock(&vp->lock);
> vortex_check_media(dev, 0);
> - spin_unlock(&vp->lock);
> }
> break;
> default: /* Other media types handled by Tx timeouts. */
> @@ -1827,6 +1837,8 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data)
> if (!ok) {
> unsigned int config;
>
> + spin_lock_irq(&vp->lock);
This can still happen every 5 seconds if the NIC has no link beat and
medialock is not set. So what about defering this locked codepath to
a workqueue, or moving the whole vortex_timer to a delayed workqueue?
In this case we don't need to disable all the interrups on the cpu, we
could still use disable_irq then.
The rest looks quite good to me.
Thanks,
Steffen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-23 23:52 [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/2] 3c59x: Locking fixes Ben Hutchings
2010-06-23 23:54 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] 3c59x: Specify window explicitly for access to windowed registers Ben Hutchings
2010-06-29 6:20 ` David Miller
2010-06-23 23:55 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] 3c59x: Use fine-grained locks for MII and windowed register access Ben Hutchings
2010-06-24 12:05 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2010-06-24 12:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-06-24 14:00 ` Steffen Klassert
2010-06-25 0:45 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-06-25 8:24 ` Steffen Klassert
2010-06-29 6:18 ` David Miller
2010-06-29 6:39 ` Steffen Klassert
2010-06-30 1:26 ` [PATCHv2 net-next-2.6] " Ben Hutchings
2010-06-30 6:15 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100624120517.GI5570@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nordmark@mech.kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.