From: Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] cxgb4vf: Add code to provision T4 PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions with hardware resources
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:11:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006251511.46660.leedom@chelsio.com> (raw)
Add code to provision T4 PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions with hardware
resources.
Signed-off-by: Casey Leedom
---
drivers/net/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c | 106
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c b/drivers/net/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
index 27f65b5..6528167 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
@@ -77,6 +77,76 @@
*/
#define MAX_SGE_TIMERVAL 200U
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
+/*
+ * Virtual Function provisioning constants. We need two extra Ingress Queues
+ * with Interrupt capability to serve as the VF's Firmware Event Queue and
+ * Forwarded Interrupt Queue (when using MSI mode) -- neither will have Free
+ * Lists associated with them). For each Ethernet/Control Egress Queue and
+ * for each Free List, we need an Egress Context.
+ */
+enum {
+ VFRES_NPORTS = 1, /* # of "ports" per VF */
+ VFRES_NQSETS = 2, /* # of "Queue Sets" per VF */
+
+ VFRES_NVI = VFRES_NPORTS, /* # of Virtual Interfaces */
+ VFRES_NETHCTRL = VFRES_NQSETS, /* # of EQs used for ETH or CTRL Qs */
+ VFRES_NIQFLINT = VFRES_NQSETS+2,/* # of ingress Qs/w Free List(s)/intr */
+ VFRES_NIQ = 0, /* # of non-fl/int ingress queues */
+ VFRES_NEQ = VFRES_NQSETS*2, /* # of egress queues */
+ VFRES_TC = 0, /* PCI-E traffic class */
+ VFRES_NEXACTF = 16, /* # of exact MPS filters */
+
+ VFRES_R_CAPS = FW_CMD_CAP_DMAQ|FW_CMD_CAP_VF|FW_CMD_CAP_PORT,
+ VFRES_WX_CAPS = FW_CMD_CAP_DMAQ|FW_CMD_CAP_VF,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Provide a Port Access Rights Mask for the specified PF/VF. This is very
+ * static and likely not to be useful in the long run. We really need to
+ * implement some form of persistent configuration which the firmware
+ * controls.
+ */
+static unsigned int pfvfres_pmask(struct adapter *adapter,
+ unsigned int pf, unsigned int vf)
+{
+ unsigned int portn, portvec;
+
+ /*
+ * Give PF's access to all of the ports.
+ */
+ if (vf == 0)
+ return FW_PFVF_CMD_PMASK_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * For VFs, we'll assign them access to the ports based purely on the
+ * PF. We assign active ports in order, wrapping around if there are
+ * fewer active ports than PFs: e.g. active port[pf % nports].
+ * Unfortunately the adapter's port_info structs haven't been
+ * initialized yet so we have to compute this.
+ */
+ if (adapter->params.nports == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ portn = pf % adapter->params.nports;
+ portvec = adapter->params.portvec;
+ for (;;) {
+ /*
+ * Isolate the lowest set bit in the port vector. If we're at
+ * the port number that we want, return that as the pmask.
+ * otherwise mask that bit out of the port vector and
+ * decrement our port number ...
+ */
+ unsigned int pmask = portvec ^ (portvec & (portvec-1));
+ if (portn == 0)
+ return pmask;
+ portn--;
+ portvec &= ~pmask;
+ }
+ /*NOTREACHED*/
+}
+#endif
+
enum {
MEMWIN0_APERTURE = 65536,
MEMWIN0_BASE = 0x30000,
@@ -2925,6 +2995,42 @@ static int adap_init0(struct adapter *adap)
t4_read_mtu_tbl(adap, adap->params.mtus, NULL);
t4_load_mtus(adap, adap->params.mtus, adap->params.a_wnd,
adap->params.b_wnd);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
+ /*
+ * Provision resource limits for Virtual Functions. We currently
+ * grant them all the same static resource limits except for the Port
+ * Access Rights Mask which we're assigning based on the PF. All of
+ * the static provisioning stuff for both the PF and VF really needs
+ * to be managed in a persistent manner for each device which the
+ * firmware controls.
+ */
+ {
+ int pf, vf;
+
+ for (pf = 0; pf < ARRAY_SIZE(num_vf); pf++) {
+ if (num_vf[pf] <= 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /* VF numbering starts at 1! */
+ for (vf = 1; vf <= num_vf[pf]; vf++) {
+ ret = t4_cfg_pfvf(adap, 0, pf, vf,
+ VFRES_NEQ, VFRES_NETHCTRL,
+ VFRES_NIQFLINT, VFRES_NIQ,
+ VFRES_TC, VFRES_NVI,
+ FW_PFVF_CMD_CMASK_MASK,
+ pfvfres_pmask(adap, pf, vf),
+ VFRES_NEXACTF,
+ VFRES_R_CAPS, VFRES_WX_CAPS);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_warn(adap->pdev_dev, "failed to "
+ "provision pf/vf=%d/%d; "
+ "err=%d\n", pf, vf, ret);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
return 0;
/*
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-25 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-25 22:11 Casey Leedom [this message]
2010-06-26 13:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] cxgb4vf: Add code to provision T4 PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions with hardware resources Simon Horman
2010-06-28 16:55 ` Casey Leedom
2010-06-29 0:51 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006251511.46660.leedom@chelsio.com \
--to=leedom@chelsio.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.