All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:04:31 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100628130431.GA6209@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C249BEA.1030908@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:07:06PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Support prefetch ptes when intercept guest #PF, avoid to #PF by later
> access
> 
> If we meet any failure in the prefetch path, we will exit it and
> not try other ptes to avoid become heavy path
> 
> Note: this speculative will mark page become dirty but it not really
> accessed, the same issue is in other speculative paths like invlpg,
> pte write, fortunately, it just affect host memory management. After
> Avi's patchset named "[PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: MMU: Introduce drop_spte()"
> merged, we will easily fix it. Will do it in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c         |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 6c06666..b2ad723 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ module_param(oos_shadow, bool, 0644);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> +#define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM	16
> +
>  #define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 9
>  #define PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 52
>  
> @@ -1998,6 +2000,72 @@ static void nonpaging_new_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				    struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> +				    u64 *start, u64 *end)
> +{
> +	gfn_t gfn;
> +	struct page *pages[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> +
> +	if (pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache(vcpu, end - start))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	gfn = sp->gfn + start - sp->spt;
> +	while (start < end) {
> +		unsigned long addr;
> +		int entry, j, ret;
> +
> +		addr = gfn_to_hva_many(vcpu->kvm, gfn, &entry);
> +		if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		entry = min(entry, (int)(end - start));
> +		ret = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, entry, 1, pages);
> +		if (ret <= 0)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < ret; j++, gfn++, start++)
> +			mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL,
> +				     sp->role.access, 0, 0, 1, NULL,
> +				     sp->role.level, gfn,
> +				     page_to_pfn(pages[j]), true, false);
> +
> +		if (ret < entry)
> +			return -1;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void direct_pte_prefetch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +	u64 *start = NULL;
> +	int index, i, max;
> +
> +	sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
> +	WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct);
> +
> +	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +	i = index & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +	max = index | (PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +
> +	for (; i < max; i++) {
> +		u64 *spte = sp->spt + i;
> +
> +		if (*spte != shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte || spte == sptep) {
> +			if (!start)
> +				continue;
> +			if (direct_pte_prefetch_many(vcpu, sp, start, spte) < 0)
> +				break;
> +			start = NULL;
> +		} else if (!start)
> +			start = spte;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
>  			int level, gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn)
>  {
> @@ -2012,6 +2080,7 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
>  				     0, write, 1, &pt_write,
>  				     level, gfn, pfn, false, true);
>  			++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
> +			direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, iterator.sptep);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index fdba751..134f031 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -291,6 +291,79 @@ static void FNAME(update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>  		     gpte_to_gfn(gpte), pfn, true, true);
>  }
>  
> +static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +	pt_element_t gptep[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> +	gpa_t first_pte_gpa;
> +	int offset = 0, index, i, j, max;
> +
> +	sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +
> +	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (sp->role.direct)
> +		return direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, sptep);

Can never happen.

> +
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +	i = index & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +	max = index | (PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +
> +	if (PTTYPE == 32)
> +		offset = sp->role.quadrant << PT64_LEVEL_BITS;
> +
> +	first_pte_gpa = gfn_to_gpa(sp->gfn) +
> +				(offset + i) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
> +
> +	if (kvm_read_guest_atomic(vcpu->kvm, first_pte_gpa, gptep,
> +					sizeof(gptep)) < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (j = 0; i < max; i++, j++) {
> +		pt_element_t gpte;
> +		unsigned pte_access;
> +		u64 *spte = sp->spt + i;
> +		gfn_t gfn;
> +		pfn_t pfn;
> +
> +		if (spte == sptep)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (*spte != shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		gpte = gptep[j];
> +
> +		if (is_rsvd_bits_set(vcpu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!is_present_gpte(gpte)) {
> +			if (!sp->unsync)
> +				__set_spte(spte, shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		gfn = gpte_to_gfn(gpte);
> +
> +		pfn = gfn_to_pfn_atomic(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> +		if (is_error_pfn(pfn) ||
> +			pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache(vcpu, 1)) {
> +			kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		pte_access = sp->role.access & FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, gpte);
> +		mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
> +			     is_dirty_gpte(gpte), NULL, sp->role.level, gfn,
> +			     pfn, true, false);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Fetch a shadow pte for a specific level in the paging hierarchy.
>   */
> @@ -322,6 +395,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
>  				     user_fault, write_fault,
>  				     dirty, ptwrite, level,
>  				     gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
> +			FNAME(pte_prefetch)(vcpu, sptep);
>  			break;
>  		}


I'm afraid this can introduce regressions since it increases mmu_lock
contention. Can you get some numbers with 4-vcpu or 8-vcpu guest and
many threads benchmarks, such as kernbench and apachebench? (on
non-EPT).

Also prefetch should be disabled for EPT, due to lack of accessed bit.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-28 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:43   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  9:49     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:50   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:17         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:06           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:35             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:49               ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:04                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  9:13                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:13                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:38             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:45               ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:51                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:08                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:55   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-06-29  8:07     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  0:58         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100628130431.GA6209@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.