From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: SMDK6440: I2C writes fails Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20100628141706.GD7403@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20100624113236.GA3958@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <34703F8C-7A9C-43FE-A748-9F6E90F3D425@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:59899 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754390Ab0F1ORI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:17:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Naveen Krishna Ch Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Dooks On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:53:18AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: > On 24 June 2010 22:05, Mark Brown wrote: > > That smells rather like a compiler bug to me - the two versions > > ought to be equivalent apart from the ordering of the comparisons. > I'm not sure, I'm using arm-2009q3 toolchain. I don't see any reason to suspect that a particular codesourcery code drop from last year would be compltely bug free?