From: wysochanski@sourceware.org <wysochanski@sourceware.org>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2/lib format_text/format-text.c metadata/me ...
Date: 28 Jun 2010 20:35:18 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100628203518.16639.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2
Module name: LVM2
Changes by: wysochanski at sourceware.org 2010-06-28 20:35:17
Modified files:
lib/format_text: format-text.c
lib/metadata : metadata.c
Log message:
Update _vg_read and _text_create_text_instance to use fid_add_mda[s].
When we are constructing the vg, we may need to adjust the list of
metadata_areas if there are ignored mdas. At label read time, we
do not read the metadata of ignored mdas, and as a result, they do
not get placed on vg->fid->metadata_areas inside _text_create_text_instance
since lvmcache does not have these areas attached to vginfo->infos.
However, when we're checking the pvids inside _vg_read, after having
read another metadata area from another PV, we do have the opportunity
to update the metadata_area and metadata_areas_ignored lists based
on the read metadata_area. We need accurate mda lists for the reporting
functions that count the ignored mdas, as well as general correctness
of mda balancing.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/format_text/format-text.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.132&r2=1.133
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/metadata/metadata.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.354&r2=1.355
--- LVM2/lib/format_text/format-text.c 2010/06/28 20:33:23 1.132
+++ LVM2/lib/format_text/format-text.c 2010/06/28 20:35:17 1.133
@@ -1891,11 +1891,11 @@
{
struct format_instance *fid;
struct text_fid_context *fidtc;
- struct metadata_area *mda, *mda_new;
+ struct metadata_area *mda;
struct mda_context *mdac;
struct dir_list *dl;
struct raw_list *rl;
- struct dm_list *dir_list, *raw_list, *mdas;
+ struct dm_list *dir_list, *raw_list;
char path[PATH_MAX];
struct lvmcache_vginfo *vginfo;
struct lvmcache_info *info;
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@
return_NULL;
mda->ops = &_metadata_text_file_backup_ops;
mda->metadata_locn = context;
- dm_list_add(&fid->metadata_areas_in_use, &mda->list);
+ fid_add_mda(fid, mda);
} else {
dir_list = &((struct mda_lists *) fmt->private)->dirs;
@@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@
return_NULL;
mda->ops = &_metadata_text_file_ops;
mda->metadata_locn = context;
- dm_list_add(&fid->metadata_areas_in_use, &mda->list);
+ fid_add_mda(fid, mda);
}
raw_list = &((struct mda_lists *) fmt->private)->raws;
@@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@
memcpy(&mdac->area, &rl->dev_area, sizeof(mdac->area));
mda->ops = &_metadata_text_raw_ops;
/* FIXME MISTAKE? mda->metadata_locn = context; */
- dm_list_add(&fid->metadata_areas_in_use, &mda->list);
+ fid_add_mda(fid, mda);
}
/* Scan PVs in VG for any further MDAs */
@@ -1968,14 +1968,8 @@
if (!(vginfo = vginfo_from_vgname(vgname, vgid)))
goto_out;
dm_list_iterate_items(info, &vginfo->infos) {
- mdas = &info->mdas;
- dm_list_iterate_items(mda, mdas) {
- /* FIXME Check it holds this VG */
- mda_new = mda_copy(fmt->cmd->mem, mda);
- if (!mda_new)
- return_NULL;
- dm_list_add(&fid->metadata_areas_in_use, &mda_new->list);
- }
+ if (!fid_add_mdas(fid, &info->mdas))
+ return_NULL;
}
/* FIXME Check raw metadata area count - rescan if required */
}
--- LVM2/lib/metadata/metadata.c 2010/06/28 20:34:58 1.354
+++ LVM2/lib/metadata/metadata.c 2010/06/28 20:35:17 1.355
@@ -2723,7 +2723,8 @@
if (correct_vg) {
/*
* If the VG has PVs without mdas, or ignored mdas, they may
- * still be orphans in the cache: update the cache state here.
+ * still be orphans in the cache: update the cache state here,
+ * and update the metadata lists in the vg.
*/
if (!inconsistent &&
dm_list_size(&correct_vg->pvs) > dm_list_size(pvids)) {
@@ -2747,6 +2748,9 @@
inconsistent_pvs = 1;
break;
}
+ if (dm_list_size(&info->mdas) &&
+ !fid_add_mdas(fid, &info->mdas))
+ return_NULL;
}
/* If the check passed, let's update VG and recalculate pvids */
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 20:35 wysochanski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-29 22:37 LVM2/lib format_text/format-text.c metadata/me wysochanski
2010-06-28 20:32 wysochanski
2010-06-28 20:31 wysochanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100628203518.16639.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=wysochanski@sourceware.org \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.