diff for duplicates of <20100629015822.GD24343@mail.oracle.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 398d0be..3115363 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 06:12:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote: -> > ? ? ? ?Your contention is that we've never gotten those tail blocks to -> > disk. ?Instead, our code either handles the future extensions of i_size -> > or we've just gotten lucky with our testing. ?Our current BUG trigger is -> > because we have a new check that catches this case. ?Does that summarize +> > Your contention is that we've never gotten those tail blocks to +> > disk. Instead, our code either handles the future extensions of i_size +> > or we've just gotten lucky with our testing. Our current BUG trigger is +> > because we have a new check that catches this case. Does that summarize > > your position correctly? > > Maybe Dave has some more exhaustive answer, but his point that @@ -41,5 +41,5 @@ Joel Joel Becker Consulting Software Developer Oracle -E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com +E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127 diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 567c427..b4cb319 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\020100629005403.GC24343@mail.oracle.com\0" "ref\0AANLkTil1R9I94pVXLE50JAMPIwpiaZuroJAg4wcwyBUb@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>\0" - "Subject\0[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert \"writeback: limit write_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF\"\0" + "Subject\0Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert \"writeback: limit write_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF\"\0" "Date\0Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:58:23 -0700\0" "To\0Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>\0" "Cc\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>" @@ -17,10 +17,10 @@ "b\0" "On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 06:12:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:\n" "> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:\n" - "> > ? ? ? ?Your contention is that we've never gotten those tail blocks to\n" - "> > disk. ?Instead, our code either handles the future extensions of i_size\n" - "> > or we've just gotten lucky with our testing. ?Our current BUG trigger is\n" - "> > because we have a new check that catches this case. ?Does that summarize\n" + "> > \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240Your contention is that we've never gotten those tail blocks to\n" + "> > disk. \302\240Instead, our code either handles the future extensions of i_size\n" + "> > or we've just gotten lucky with our testing. \302\240Our current BUG trigger is\n" + "> > because we have a new check that catches this case. \302\240Does that summarize\n" "> > your position correctly?\n" "> \n" "> Maybe Dave has some more exhaustive answer, but his point that\n" @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ "Joel Becker\n" "Consulting Software Developer\n" "Oracle\n" - "E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com\n" + "E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com\n" Phone: (650) 506-8127 -5fd1e64c1ad59db223cce5ff6487ddec59437d1d7ca55e52269ac43b1206afe2 +c0375a2bfa5eb13b9d278d65aa7e478002c3df4ba875f98e17f9ca35b62e93be
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.