diff for duplicates of <20100629024406.GB6590@dastard> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1a186c4..eb0f6b2 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:20:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote: > > -> > ? ? ? ?Well, shit. ?Something has changed in here, or we're really -> > really (un)lucky. ?We visited this code a year ago or so when we had -> > serious zeroing problems, and we tested the hell out of it. ?Now it is -> > broken again. ?And it sure looks like that block_write_full_page() check +> > Well, shit. Something has changed in here, or we're really +> > really (un)lucky. We visited this code a year ago or so when we had +> > serious zeroing problems, and we tested the hell out of it. Now it is +> > broken again. And it sure looks like that block_write_full_page() check > > has been there since before git. > > Hmm. I'm actually starting to worry that we should do the revert after all. @@ -62,4 +62,4 @@ Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner -david at fromorbit.com +david@fromorbit.com diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index cdb7e5d..04cf05f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ "ref\020100629015822.GD24343@mail.oracle.com\0" "ref\0AANLkTil5y7F9w-18mVi0G1S5pSv9MiKq6XL5MWAMFBQM@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0" - "Subject\0[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert \"writeback: limit write_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF\"\0" + "Subject\0Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Revert \"writeback: limit write_cache_pages integrity scanning to current EOF\"\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:44:06 +1000\0" "To\0Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>\0" "Cc\0Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>" @@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ "On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:20:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:\n" "> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:\n" "> >\n" - "> > ? ? ? ?Well, shit. ?Something has changed in here, or we're really\n" - "> > really (un)lucky. ?We visited this code a year ago or so when we had\n" - "> > serious zeroing problems, and we tested the hell out of it. ?Now it is\n" - "> > broken again. ?And it sure looks like that block_write_full_page() check\n" + "> > \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240Well, shit. \302\240Something has changed in here, or we're really\n" + "> > really (un)lucky. \302\240We visited this code a year ago or so when we had\n" + "> > serious zeroing problems, and we tested the hell out of it. \302\240Now it is\n" + "> > broken again. \302\240And it sure looks like that block_write_full_page() check\n" "> > has been there since before git.\n" "> \n" "> Hmm. I'm actually starting to worry that we should do the revert after all.\n" @@ -80,6 +80,6 @@ "Dave.\n" "-- \n" "Dave Chinner\n" - david at fromorbit.com + david@fromorbit.com -afe8b2cce86ac16067cc61c074031e61fa7d55bdcbc967ca49ebe19d44c1e53e +a31094be95bfb8ffe19fd895feaa9f529a0af340df606b3f89b431a407869163
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.