All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>
To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:11:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629201153.GA13018@localhost> (raw)

From what I read from the internet, write-intent bitmap decreases raid
performance and provides more stability. But in my situation, it also
increases raid performance dramatically!

My RAID5 write speed without write-intent bitmap is 90MB/s, and is
increased to 200MB/s after enabling internal write-intent bitmap. I
use ext4 filesystem on this raid array. The following is my RAID5
array information:

# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
        Version : 1.0
  Creation Time : Mon Nov 16 02:46:50 2009
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 10255968576 (9780.85 GiB 10502.11 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 1465138368 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
   Raid Devices : 8
  Total Devices : 8
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

  Intent Bitmap : Internal

    Update Time : Wed Jun 30 03:51:56 2010
          State : active
 Active Devices : 8
Working Devices : 8
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

           Name : AOpen:00
           UUID : abb2242c:6a250d29:df65e52b:426f4ed9
         Events : 405636

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       4       8       17        0      active sync   /dev/sdb1
       1       8       33        1      active sync   /dev/sdc1
       2       8       49        2      active sync   /dev/sdd1
       3       8       65        3      active sync   /dev/sde1
       5       8       81        4      active sync   /dev/sdf1
       6       8       97        5      active sync   /dev/sdg1
       7       8      113        6      active sync   /dev/sdh1
       8       8      129        7      active sync   /dev/sdi1

-- 
Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn>

Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org

             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29 20:11 Shaochun Wang [this message]
2010-06-30  5:18 ` Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5? Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30  5:54   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30  5:59     ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30  6:58       ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-06-30  8:23         ` Roman Mamedov
2010-06-30 18:31           ` CoolCold
2010-07-05  0:11         ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01  6:40     ` Shaochun Wang
2010-07-01 20:30       ` Majed B.
2010-07-01 20:50         ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-05  0:14         ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-01 20:49       ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-02 11:13         ` John Robinson
2010-07-05  0:17         ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100629201153.GA13018@localhost \
    --to=scwang@ios.ac.cn \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.