All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, bphilips@novell.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:38:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100630043728.9224.64191.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

x86 architectures can handle unaligned accesses in hardware, and it has
been shown that unaligned DMA accesses can be expensive on Nehalem
architectures.  As such we should overwrite NET_IP_ALIGN to resolve
this issue.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/system.h |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
index b8fe48e..b4293fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
@@ -457,4 +457,13 @@ static inline void rdtsc_barrier(void)
 	alternative(ASM_NOP3, "lfence", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MCORE2
+/*
+ * We handle most unaligned accesses in hardware.  On the other hand
+ * unaligned DMA can be quite expensive on some Nehalem processors.
+ *
+ * Based on this we disable the IP header alignment in network drivers.
+ */
+#define NET_IP_ALIGN	0
+#endif
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_SYSTEM_H */


             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-30  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30  4:38 Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2010-06-30 21:28 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch David Miller
2010-06-30 21:32   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-30 21:34     ` David Miller
2010-07-01 11:28 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-01 20:37   ` Alexander Duyck
2010-07-01 20:41     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100630043728.9224.64191.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=bphilips@novell.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gospo@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.