From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:47858 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753499Ab0GASCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:02:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:02:41 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager Message-ID: <20100701180241.GA3594@basil.fritz.box> References: <1277877350-2147-1-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <1277877350-2147-3-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Zach Pfeffer , mel@csn.ul.ie, andi@firstfloor.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > What license (name/type) is this? IANAL, but AFAIK standard wisdom is that "disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided" is generally not acceptable for Linux because it's an excessive burden for all distributors. Also for me it's still quite unclear why we would want this code at all... It doesn't seem to do anything you couldn't do with the existing interfaces. -Andi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andi@firstfloor.org (Andi Kleen) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:02:41 +0200 Subject: [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager In-Reply-To: <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <1277877350-2147-1-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <1277877350-2147-3-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20100701180241.GA3594@basil.fritz.box> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > What license (name/type) is this? IANAL, but AFAIK standard wisdom is that "disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided" is generally not acceptable for Linux because it's an excessive burden for all distributors. Also for me it's still quite unclear why we would want this code at all... It doesn't seem to do anything you couldn't do with the existing interfaces. -Andi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904756006F7 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:02:41 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager Message-ID: <20100701180241.GA3594@basil.fritz.box> References: <1277877350-2147-1-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <1277877350-2147-3-git-send-email-zpfeffer@codeaurora.org> <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100701101746.3810cc3b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Zach Pfeffer , mel@csn.ul.ie, andi@firstfloor.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-ID: > What license (name/type) is this? IANAL, but AFAIK standard wisdom is that "disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided" is generally not acceptable for Linux because it's an excessive burden for all distributors. Also for me it's still quite unclear why we would want this code at all... It doesn't seem to do anything you couldn't do with the existing interfaces. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org