From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Write-intent bitmap decreases or increase performance of RAID5? Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:50:11 +0600 Message-ID: <20100702025011.1fdcddb6@natsu> References: <20100629201153.GA13018@localhost> <20100630111854.006ec4d0@natsu> <20100701064044.GB6058@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/kb6CA5qsvd3O.qAQql1T0tY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Majed B." Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/kb6CA5qsvd3O.qAQql1T0tY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 23:30:26 +0300 "Majed B." wrote: > How much RAM does your machine have? >=20 > Write to the disk an amount that is larger than the amount of RAM and > see if you get the same result. >=20 > Also you can use hdparm to flush the caches before running dd the 2nd tim= e. Here we go again. Read up on what conv=3Dfdatasync means, and why cache is irrelevant in this test. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/kb6CA5qsvd3O.qAQql1T0tY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkws/4MACgkQTLKSvz+PZwhsaQCfSEKLf/IG/PvwIFJyYahFxpXg M0gAni1zJKCv4rODbQH0XPK1CX9dovsV =rHI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kb6CA5qsvd3O.qAQql1T0tY--