From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: Add driver to enable access to the user dynamic network. Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 18:11:03 +0200 Message-ID: <201007021811.04197.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201006252110.o5PLArvw010770@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201006282134.55166.arnd@arndb.de> <4C2DD958.7030005@tilera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:51767 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758967Ab0GBQLO (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:11:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C2DD958.7030005@tilera.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Chris Metcalf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > So, if there's a good reason for it to be there, I'd say that pushes us > back toward a separate . Otherwise we can > investigate splitting out the prefetch content on every platform to > (presumably creating some empty > headers on architectures that just use the gcc builtin) and adding new > #includes of to files that reference the prefetch > functionality. Arnd and other list folks, what's your instinct? Makes sense. Splitting out the list types from list.h does seem to be safest option. We might actually be able to do some header file untangling that way, by using list_types.h in all headers that use a list_head by none of the macros and functions associated with it. Arnd