From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove BKL uses Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:53:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20100705145324.GA5240@nowhere> References: <1278220928-28121-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> <201007051650.23761.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/1kSIRTP7bOoawE5DH0le47P97TCveJe439HfPpFp10=; b=DhN1Hn+cLdmgjQdMY5WkyDasvdBiPMFkuMSbicf4RQarMFVrmYkAvRTZznCXxYuOT6 gzLOZXHQEnvDquojJuF11ewsRnLWI2a5pfn8CpV+iQoTc7RYU9IpzHTMHSMc6uscGQNT 8EoN/tjJD3hNjpq85vHuMVO161Dbll7kh/dFs= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007051650.23761.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nilfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Ryusuke Konishi , linux-nilfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jan Blunck On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi > > This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL > into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final > pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a > shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you > go through the effort of removing it again. I could take his patch in the mount pushdown series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758184Ab0GEOxV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:53:21 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:46519 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757782Ab0GEOxR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:53:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gUy9xZpL30muGneg6m4+jo9B/8JJcm8580oQDqPcsPzG0Q/wlo39QNWe2CZU/q4nuf kaDVb22ICKWVfZzN5EXtoJfkDNCwwLa12vhPzqHV86mna2qoG+SoN5unIf+qeSjW6o1k OER/cYb2uxtKiL+sIVKsTYk0xRlHYuFzh1k9E= Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:53:29 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Ryusuke Konishi , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Blunck Subject: Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: remove BKL uses Message-ID: <20100705145324.GA5240@nowhere> References: <1278220928-28121-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> <201007051650.23761.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007051650.23761.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 04 July 2010, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > > Nilfs has BKL uses in its put_super and remount functions, but none of > > them are necessary, just came from earlier push downs. This > > eliminates the BKL uses from nilfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi > > This looks good, but there is a another patch series pushing the BKL > into the get_sb and fill_super operations, which should be the final > pushdown for file systems. I wonder if there is a way to find a > shortcut on this so we don't need to add it first just to have you > go through the effort of removing it again. I could take his patch in the mount pushdown series.