From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm: event plig-in API fixed to compile with g++ Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:41:44 +0300 Message-ID: <20100705184144.GH22860@me> References: <4C2312F0.8020308@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20100705181143.GG22860@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: Yevgeny Kliteynik , Linux RDMA List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 14:30 Mon 05 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 11:10 Thu 24 Jun =A0 =A0 , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > >> Event API should have been able to be used by libraries > >> written both in C and C++. > > > > I don't know about such requirement. >=20 > Are you saying it isn't a valid requirement to allow OpenSM plugins t= o > be C++ based ? If so, why not ? I'm saying that there is no requirement for plugin API to support C++ - obviously (following method names) plugin API was never developed for using it in C++. Why not is another question - for instance in order to not deal with C/C++ compatibility issues (such as castings, function names limitation= , linking mess, etc.) Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html