From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:58:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20100705195837.GF5240@nowhere> References: <1278195310-25590-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <4C3235C3.7050303@zytor.com> <20100705194759.GE5240@nowhere> <201007052152.55954.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bsB3zEkUpTtZ+aXhEyztgy+AJ0U5Xph9JdvTSrqzQiE=; b=Xj6AZUjSIpPICjGDmAkosRZ1p9caRE1tpYGvPuO2+aQY+bb1krepUSGCYrv0dwZ/qc 2EYBFI1zd/MJ/vnXn+lkdzF3D0jJ4o/gQcNoK0tFMnDWWc2NAWfG5euyrHA+3G3zdGRF U9DV3KamDdxZH/hIKntrTcLb2yCqO9eREMzgk= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007052152.55954.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann , Ian Kent Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Kacur , Al Viro , autofs@linux.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > > > Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it? > > > > Unless you have a tree for autofs. > > > > > > > Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go > > > through him (or acked by him.) > > > > > > autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you > > > push the autofs 3 bits of this patch. > > > > Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send > > the standalone autofs4 version to Ian. > > I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3 > and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian > prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though. > > Arnd Yeah indeed. Ian?