From: Andreas Langer <an.langer@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:17:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100706201753.2bcbc369@rechenknecht> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100706173956.GA9429@ritirata.org>
Hi Antonio,
thanks for the question. The timeout came up to my mind just in that moment.
I don't know if 5000/10000 be a better value, has somebody else an opinion
regarding that matter ?
regards,
Andreas
> Hi all, Hi Andreas,
>
> > +#define FRAG_TIMEOUT 60000 /* purge frag list entrys after time in
> > ms */
>
> Why did you choose a so large timeout? Is there a particular reason for
> that?
>
> I think that in 60 seconds an host could receive a very large amount of
> "orphan" packets in case of a bad link causing memory problems.
>
> Could 5000/10000 be a better value?
>
> Regards,
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 15:58 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 4) Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 15:59 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/2] batctl: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 15:59 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: " Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 17:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-07-06 18:06 ` Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 17:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2010-07-06 18:17 ` Andreas Langer [this message]
2010-07-06 18:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-07-06 19:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-06 19:50 ` Marek Lindner
2010-07-07 10:40 ` Marek Lindner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-07 17:30 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 5) Andreas Langer
2010-07-07 17:32 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-09 14:51 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-05 21:42 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 3) Andreas Langer
2010-07-05 21:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-06-30 18:58 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-06-30 19:00 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-05 0:37 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-05 12:53 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100706201753.2bcbc369@rechenknecht \
--to=an.langer@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.