From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Aldo Cedillo <aldobrett11@gmail.com>
Cc: kagen101@gmail.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
devel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issues in dt3155_drv.c
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:48:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100707004841.GA28188@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingSXbyFclWga9x5aD7MoccCMqhu56PCOVTKHVJ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:25:35PM -0500, Aldo Cedillo wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > index 66db878..f6edd66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > @@ -308,33 +308,42 @@ static void dt3155_isr(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > #endif
> > if (fb->nbuffers > 2) {
> > if (!are_empty_buffers(minor)) {
> > - /* The number of active + locked buffers is
> > - * at most 2, and since there are none empty, there
> > - * must be at least nbuffers-2 ready buffers.
> > - * This is where we 'drop frames', oldest first. */
> > + /* The number of active +
> > + * locked buffers is at most 2,
> > + * and since there are none empty,
> > + * there must be at least nbuffers-2
> > + * ready buffers.
> > + * This is where we 'drop frames',
> > + * oldest first. */
> > push_empty(pop_ready(minor), minor);
> > }
> >
>
> In the CodingStyle in the kernel you can read:
>
> The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
>
> /*
> * This is the preferred style for multi-line
> * comments in the Linux kernel source code.
> * Please use it consistently.
> *
> * Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
> * with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
> */
>
> Again I ask about the coding style because I have seen in many parts of the
> kernel I've seen discrepancies with what is said in the CodingStyle file. So
> I want to get it clear maybe I can help to clean those things.
I believe that you will find both of the following styles in abundance
and that both are acceptable.
/*
* This
* is a multi-line comment
*/
And
/* This
* is a also multi-line comment
*/
Though one may be more acceptable to a given maintainer than the other.
Other variants may also be common and acceptable to some maintainers,
which I suspect is why checkpatch.pl is lenient.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 16:53 [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issues in dt3155_drv.c Joe Eloff
2010-07-06 17:25 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-06 17:37 ` Joe Eloff
2010-07-06 21:20 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-07 0:48 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2010-07-08 16:31 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-08 20:00 ` Greg KH
2010-07-11 9:49 ` Joe Eloff
2010-07-11 14:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100707004841.GA28188@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=aldobrett11@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=kagen101@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.