From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755156Ab0GHUxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:53:34 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:37969 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751436Ab0GHUxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:53:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 22:53:02 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/irq] x86: Always use irq stacks Message-ID: <20100708205302.GA23961@lst.de> References: <20100628121554.GA6605@lst.de> <20100630074434.GA25509@elte.hu> <20100630075212.GA24658@lst.de> <20100630075818.GB25509@elte.hu> <20100630080453.GA14371@elte.hu> <20100708204251.GA13569@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100708204251.GA13569@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I can see the crash with vanilla x86/irq as well, with the config i sent. > > Ping? Sorry, got preempted by a few important things when bisecting when it broke over my tested config. Give me another day or two.