From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] atm: propagate signal changes via notifier Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:04:08 +0900 Message-ID: <20100709070408.GE24576@verge.net.au> References: <4C36C353.9080501@hiramoto.org> <20100708.233801.258129125.davem@davemloft.net> <20100709065012.GB24576@verge.net.au> <20100708.235314.241453003.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: karl@hiramoto.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:48876 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751333Ab0GIHEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:04:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100708.235314.241453003.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:53:14PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Simon Horman > Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:50:13 +0900 > > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:38:01PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Karl Hiramoto > >> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:36:03 +0200 > >> > >> > Ok, fixing it, but there are 100's of occurences in net/ like i had it. :-) > >> > >> I would be happy to see a patch which fixes them up :-) > > > > Really? By my calculations it would be an awful lot of churn. > > > > $ find net/ -type f -name "*.[chS]" | xargs grep "\/\* *$" | wc -l > > 6833 > > $ find net/ -type f -name "*.[chS]" | xargs grep -l "\/\* *$" | wc -l > > 929 > > I didn't mean "one patch" which fixes them up :) > > Done graudually in chunks over a period of time, it's not likely > to be so much churn. > > This is how every other coding style malfeasance gets handled. Understood