From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYCuq-0003xh-Th for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:55:01 +0200 Received: from guest185.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de ([134.169.35.185] helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1OYCq4-0007xy-64 by authid with cram_md5 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:50:07 +0200 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OYCq3-0007Mh-AJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:50:03 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:50:03 +0200 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100712065003.GA25677@excalibur.local> References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:55:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 08:51, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/7/9 Stefan Schmidt : > > > > Open questions: > > --------------- > > - Do we feel comfortable with doing a new branch now? > > I'd say we should wailt until bitbake 1.10 is officially out (I assume > from your previous "Faster bitbake" that you want to move to 1.10) Agreed. The only problem we had recently was about file:// handling. Everything else seems to be pretty stable on the 1.10 branch. Could one of the bitbake devs comment on the question if there is a 1.10 release planned? regards Stefan Schmidt