From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Upstream tree for OMFS?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:44:35 -0700
Message-ID: <20100712104435.2ca47c0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <AANLkTilI-GLcmJjC5n2aT-0ywdOK0M5VGSUdEGYXa3VJ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34232 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752589Ab0GLRqE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:46:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilI-GLcmJjC5n2aT-0ywdOK0M5VGSUdEGYXa3VJ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:49:01 -0400 Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:

> Hello fs devs,
> 
> I have a few patches to send on to -next for OMFS
> and I finally got around to setting up a git tree for
> it.  Previously I sent things through akpm or the
> trivial tree.
> 
> I doubt anyone but me cares too much about this FS
> but I thought I'd ask first if anyone wants to be the
> upstream instead of me sending pull requests directly
> to Linus.  Of course I'll post patches here for
> review in either case.

Please ask Stephen to include the tree in the linux-next lineup.