From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:02:22 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] allow each machine to specify it's own IRQ handlers at run-time In-Reply-To: <20100712081245.GC22138@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100712081106.GB1532@pengutronix.de> <20100712081245.GC22138@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20100712130222.GA14425@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:12:45AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:11:06AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > I didn't thought it would be that easy. Nice. > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig > > It isn't - if you enable this, your platform will break because > there's no implementations of it. That makes this patch rather > hard to ack on its own. Well, I didn't test the patch but still noticed that additional code is needed to make use of it. And what I saw looked reasonable. As the Kconfig symbol isn't selected (until now) it doesn't seem to break anything. Does I need more to give my Ack? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |