From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:28:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007121328.32962@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100704225341.GY24712@dastard>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1452 bytes --]
Been on holidays, so I didn't answer till now...
On Montag, 5. Juli 2010 Dave Chinner wrote:
> > So far, so good. I'm on 2.6.34 now. Is there any chance for a fixed
> > version of xfs_repair, so that I can either get rid of the 4 broken
> > files (i.e. delete them), or repair the filesystem? ATM, xfs_repair
> > asserts on this filesystem.
>
> What version of xfs_repair? v3.1.2 does not assert fail here on the
> metadump image you posted, but it does take 3 runs to fix up all the
> problems with the busted inodes....
Do you mean this one?
http://zmi.at/saturn_bigdata.metadump.only_broken.bz2 (197 MB)
I have xfs_repair 3.1.2, and made a shell script which 10x does
xfs_repair that image, I attached the output here. Doesn't seem to
repair anything, just crashing.
Maybe I did something wrong? I configured xfsprogs 3.1.2 with
CFLAGS=-march=athlon64-sse3 ./configure --prefix=/usr
and then
make;make install
I recompiled the whole thing now with
# gcc --version
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.4.1 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 150839]
and it's the same output as ever. Either you meant another metadump, or
there is a problem somewhere I don't see.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: repair.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 15828 bytes --]
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 2
- agno = 1
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
data fork in inode 649642 claims metadata block 537266460
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 649642 claims metadata block 537266460
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
data fork in inode 649642 claims metadata block 537266460
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
xfs_repair version 3.1.2
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan and clear agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
corrected attribute entry count in inode 649642, was 40, now 0
problem with attribute contents in inode 649642
local inode 649790 attr too small (size = 1, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 649790, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 649790 attributes
cleared inode 649790
- agno = 1
local inode 2195133988 attr too small (size = 3, min size = 4)
bad attribute fork in inode 2195133988, clearing attr fork
clearing inode 2195133988 attributes
cleared inode 2195133988
corrected attribute entry count in inode 2902971474, was 163, now 0
corrected attribute entry totsize in inode 2902971474, was 6, now 4
problem with attribute contents in inode 2902971474
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 1
- agno = 0
- agno = 3
- agno = 2
- agno = 4
- agno = 5
data fork in inode 2195133988 claims metadata block 537122652
- agno = 6
- agno = 7
xfs_repair: dinode.c:2101: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-12 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-27 1:10 WARNING xfsdump [still] Cannot allocate memory for list of [root|non-root] attributes for nondir ino xxyz Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-28 2:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-29 22:33 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) Linda Walsh
2010-06-29 23:25 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ " Dave Chinner
2010-06-29 23:55 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-06-30 0:42 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ " Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 2:45 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-01 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-07 3:18 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07 5:56 ` Linda Walsh
2010-07-07 6:36 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-07 9:30 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07 21:01 ` Linda Walsh
2010-06-30 0:01 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 1:06 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ " Dave Chinner
2010-06-30 1:52 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ " Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 21:01 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-07 21:40 ` utf-8' chars from Winxp machine may be problem related (was Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair...) Linda A. Walsh
2010-07-07 23:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-08 0:38 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-30 18:25 ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) Michael Monnerie
2010-06-30 23:30 ` rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem) Dave Chinner
2010-07-01 8:25 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-02 2:42 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-02 6:21 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-04 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 11:28 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2010-07-07 21:56 ` Linda Walsh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-15 20:58 Michael Monnerie
2010-07-15 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-16 14:17 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-16 14:40 ` Michael Monnerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007121328.32962@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.