From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: Upstream tree for OMFS? Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:13:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20100712221307.GB8787@hash.localnet> References: <20100712104435.2ca47c0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([72.66.92.28]:4397 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754798Ab0GLWPD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:15:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100712104435.2ca47c0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I doubt anyone but me cares too much about this FS > > but I thought I'd ask first if anyone wants to be the > > upstream instead of me sending pull requests directly > > to Linus. Of course I'll post patches here for > > review in either case. > > Please ask Stephen to include the tree in the linux-next lineup. Ok - Stephen would you mind including this tree for omfs? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcopeland/omfs.git#for-next -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com