From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LMB bits
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:45:18 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100713.094518.133409593.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikkqL9ppLDaLP6ISkuAawgGF-4ly28sAhdLW3AM@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:11:57 -0700
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ingo, Linus, how to you want to proceed ? We could get the rename patch
>> in now, that would make things easier for the ARM folks who have started
>> using LMB as well and are currently clashing in linux-next, and keep the
>> rest of the rework for the merge window ? Or keep the whole thing for
>> the merge window ?
>
> If it's just a rename, and the accidental lmb renames have been all
> sorted out, then I'm ok with taking a pure rename that changes nothing
> else now, just to make things easier to merge later.
I'd also be real happy if we did this now too.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1278031351-23223-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
2010-07-09 7:11 ` LMB bits Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-09 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-09 7:28 ` David Miller
2010-07-09 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-09 8:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-07-09 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-10 0:20 ` David Miller
2010-07-10 3:55 ` David Miller
2010-07-10 11:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-10 20:14 ` David Miller
2010-07-10 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-12 3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-12 7:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-12 22:34 ` David Miller
2010-07-13 7:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-13 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-13 15:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-13 16:45 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100713.094518.133409593.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.