From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: LMB bits Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:54:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20100713085425.GC7984@elte.hu> References: <4C38DDE3.9010303@kernel.org> <1278905081.28659.157.camel@pasglop> <1278920286.28659.194.camel@pasglop> <20100712.153455.108790468.davem@davemloft.net> <1279005164.28659.407.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:35931 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753581Ab0GMIyj (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:54:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1279005164.28659.407.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: David Miller , yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:34 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:38:06 +1000 > > > > > Ok pushed. > > > > Your current tree headed by 94f4de71740edb80dfbd3916fe83308d545a4419 > > works fine for me. > > Thanks Dave. > > Ingo, Linus, how to you want to proceed ? We could get the rename patch in > now, that would make things easier for the ARM folks who have started using > LMB as well and are currently clashing in linux-next, and keep the rest of > the rework for the merge window ? Or keep the whole thing for the merge > window ? I'd suggest you send a pull request to Linus with the rename - it is purely mechanical, tested and it will make life much easier in the merge window. Also, we are shortly after -rc5 now so should there be any fallout, there's enough time until -rc6. Thanks, Ingo