From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Status of BTRFS
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:07:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20100716150750.GA2398@localhost.localdomain>
References: <000001cb24dd$cab87650$602962f0$@com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Edward Ned Harvey <kernel@nedharvey.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <000001cb24dd$cab87650$602962f0$@com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:55:26AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS?=A0 Like=
 ...=A0 Is
> it usable yet, and stuff like that?
>=20

Use it if you don't care about the data on your box or do regular backu=
ps.  All
of us developers run it on our workstations without much of an issue th=
ough.
Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html